Mayer Consulting homepage

AI in Jury Research: A Powerful Tool, But No Substitute for Human Expertise

Jury Research

Summary: A Powerful Tool, But No Substitute for Human Expertise.

In this post we examine the transformative role of AI in jury research, discussing its benefits in speeding up data analysis and identifying juror patterns while cautioning against over-reliance on AI-only solutions. It emphasizes the importance of combining AI’s efficiency with the expertise of seasoned jury researchers, who bring critical judgment, intuition, and the ability to interpret juror behavior. Attorneys are encouraged to seek out jury research services that strategically integrate AI with human insight to ensure the best possible outcomes.

4 Minute Read


As AI permeates nearly every industry, including the legal field, it presents opportunities and challenges. For those of us who have spent years conducting jury research in criminal and civil cases, introducing AI into the jury selection process is intriguing, if at times somewhat concerning. Having worked as a criminal defense investigator and mitigation specialist for over 15 years, I’ve seen firsthand how nuanced jury research can be—and how critical the human element is in securing favorable outcomes.

AI’s Advantage in Jury Research

AI offers clear advantages in efficiency and speed. Today’s tools can help us to rapidly analyze large datasets to provide insights into jurors’ backgrounds, ideologies, and decision-making tendencies. AI tools can quickly sift through juror questionnaires or social media data to identify patterns in language use or flag potential biases or tendencies that may be missed by human eyes.

AI tools can also provide objective analysis and reduce human bias while generating fact-based profiles. However, the power of AI can also be a double-edged sword. If the data sets fed into AI systems are biased, there’s a risk that these biases may be perpetuated or even amplified in the analysis. Jury researchers and legal teams must remain vigilant in how they use AI tools, ensuring that they do not unintentionally introduce ethical concerns into the process. 

The Best Approach: AI and Human Expertise

Perhaps inevitably, some outfits have already begun offering jury research services based solely on AI, simply plugging juror names and profiles into a system, forgoing the critical human insights at the heart of effective jury research. While these AI-only approaches may appeal for their speed and low cost, they lack the nuance and flexibility that seasoned jury research professionals bring to the table. Human expertise is key in making real-time adjustments, interpreting subtleties in juror behavior, and engaging with jurors on a personal level.

AI’s true value emerges when combined with the expertise of seasoned jury research professionals. Combining AI’s data-processing capabilities with professional expertise makes jury research faster, more accurate, and cost-effective. For example, AI can efficiently sort and rank juror candidates based on certain traits or tendencies, but only an experienced jury consultant can assess how these traits manifest in the context of a specific case or jurisdiction. This balanced approach leverages available technology while preserving the human skills essential for understanding jurors’ motives and intent.

The Future of Jury Research

AI is already transforming jury selection, but today, it appears unlikely to replace the nuanced judgment and intuition experienced jury researchers provide. The subjective elements of jury research—such as reading body language, assessing emotional responses, or understanding a juror’s lived experiences—are still best handled by human experts. AI, while powerful, lacks the ability to interpret these non-verbal cues in real time. The future lies in combining the best of both worlds—AI’s speed and data processing capabilities with human expertise to interpret, adapt, and engage with jurors in ways only humans can.

Attorneys should carefully vet any jury research service, looking for those who don’t rely solely on AI but instead use it as a tool to enhance the process. By integrating AI strategically and intelligently with human expertise, legal teams can gain deeper insights while still retaining the critical human touch that defines successful jury research. By working with jury researchers who leverage the unquestionable benefits offered by AI tools and the insights of skilled professionals, attorneys can feel confident that they are securing the most favorable outcomes for their clients.